By – Naresh Bana, Domingo Penalver, Shubham Joshi and Lovesh Gupta
Picture courtesy.
Introduction
Urban mobility and commuting have largely relied on mass rapid transportation systems (MRTS), especially in the major cities around the world. A major advantage of MRTS (light rail, tramway, metro/underground, regional rail, bus rapid transit, etc.) is the way it handles elasticity in demand peaks as it can carry on an enormous number of passengers through optimizing space as well as increasing the frequency of convoys.
Until COVID-19 arrived, space optimization was achieved through an unlimited progressive declining of passenger separation. A typical image that we all have in mind is, for example, the case of the Japanese metro during peak hours, where space optimization onboard is achieved by incremental compression among passengers. After the pandemic MRTS’ capacity has dropped down dramatically. Suddenly the capacity to transport an astonishing number of passengers is no more decided by “elbow distance” or lack of it, but by pandemic dictated social and physical distancing norms, which in most countries implies keeping some two-meter distance between co-passengers. In the case of bus public transit, it translates into a reduction of carrying capacity from 80 to 20 passengers each trip, i.e. a reduction of 75%. Even assuming that some 25% of previously MRTS’ users might work from home, there still remains a 50% reduction in capacity for bus transit. So we now suddenly have a demand for three buses for each bus that provided service before the pandemic.
It is obvious that creating a significant increase in the capacity of MRTS will be very challenging as supporting infrastructure i.e. roads and tracks, is already at optimum exploitation level. This lack of elasticity in the offer side implies that there is now a pressing necessity for innovative solutions to deliver adequate MRTS services so as to limit the eventual rise in socioeconomic costs (time, safety, health, etc.). In this sense, private involvement in the proposal and development of technical solutions in hard and soft infrastructure financing is appearing to be assuming a central role. It is worthwhile noting that, at this precise moment in time, economies are under scrutiny, so additional costs on state finances could be detrimental for national recovery strategies.
In short, metropolitan cities find themselves in an extraordinary situation where transport authorities envisage a reduction in carriage capacity to one third or quarter with respect to the pre-pandemic capacity. Fortunately, the remedy to such an extraordinary challenge does not appear to rely on developing more physical infrastructure. It rather appears that smart individual mobility solutions, based on (quick) technology development and thus simpler to operate could be a solution to overcome the mobility needs of society, at least in the short and medium-term. In this sense, point to point connectivity through electric-powered bicycles, duly complemented with last-mile connectivity options, appears as an attractive alternative for every day commuting.
What Commuters Say?
A limited survey was conducted in the National Capital Region of India with the aim of obtaining inputs from the MRTS’ users, who just took metro or bus to reach the workplace before the pandemic Covid-19. Salient findings are presented below:
Proposed Solution
The Concept
Development of Dedicated Bicycle Corridors
Typical Features of the Corridor
Conclusion
Personal mobility is critical for the survival of those who could use the public transport earlier. Junior to mid-level employees in almost all offices / enterprises are either working from home or unable to reach office. In such situation, the concept of dedicated bicycle corridors appears a workable simple solution, which can be adapted quickly to provide mobility to those who need it most to ensure normalcy in day to day life in urban areas. Proposed solution could also be applied to other metro cities and other countries in the world. This corridor appears to be taking care of the most crucial part for economic development- i.e., Personal daily commute to the workplace. It is economic, eco-friendly and an aid to the good health of the user. In fact it is a befitting example of sustainable development and achievement of the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals.
Authors:
Naresh Bana, F.I.E., M.I.M.A. is an international PPP consultant based in New Delhi. He can be reached at. Email naresh@wappp.net LinkedIn www.linkedin.com/in/narebbv4237
Domingo Peñalver, PhD is Spain based scholar specialising in PPPs. Email domingo.penalver@wappp.net , LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/domingo-p-4a165014/
Shubham Joshi and Lovesh Gupta are MBA students in University Business School, Panjab University, Chandigarh and currently on Internship. Email : Shubham Joshi shubhamjoshi.ubs@gmail.com LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/mwlite/in/shubham-joshi-158234176; Lovesh Gupta loveshgupta.ubs@gmail.com LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/mwlite/in/lovesh-gupta309
By – Naresh Bana, Domingo Penalver, Shubham Joshi and Lovesh Gupta
Picture courtesy.
Introduction
Urban mobility and commuting have largely relied on mass rapid transportation systems (MRTS), especially in the major cities around the world. A major advantage of MRTS (light rail, tramway, metro/underground, regional rail, bus rapid transit, etc.) is the way it handles elasticity in demand peaks as it can carry on an enormous number of passengers through optimizing space as well as increasing the frequency of convoys.
Until COVID-19 arrived, space optimization was achieved through an unlimited progressive declining of passenger separation. A typical image that we all have in mind is, for example, the case of the Japanese metro during peak hours, where space optimization onboard is achieved by incremental compression among passengers. After the pandemic MRTS’ capacity has dropped down dramatically. Suddenly the capacity to transport an astonishing number of passengers is no more decided by “elbow distance” or lack of it, but by pandemic dictated social and physical distancing norms, which in most countries implies keeping some two-meter distance between co-passengers. In the case of bus public transit, it translates into a reduction of carrying capacity from 80 to 20 passengers each trip, i.e. a reduction of 75%. Even assuming that some 25% of previously MRTS’ users might work from home, there still remains a 50% reduction in capacity for bus transit. So we now suddenly have a demand for three buses for each bus that provided service before the pandemic.
It is obvious that creating a significant increase in the capacity of MRTS will be very challenging as supporting infrastructure i.e. roads and tracks, is already at optimum exploitation level. This lack of elasticity in the offer side implies that there is now a pressing necessity for innovative solutions to deliver adequate MRTS services so as to limit the eventual rise in socioeconomic costs (time, safety, health, etc.). In this sense, private involvement in the proposal and development of technical solutions in hard and soft infrastructure financing is appearing to be assuming a central role. It is worthwhile noting that, at this precise moment in time, economies are under scrutiny, so additional costs on state finances could be detrimental for national recovery strategies.
In short, metropolitan cities find themselves in an extraordinary situation where transport authorities envisage a reduction in carriage capacity to one third or quarter with respect to the pre-pandemic capacity. Fortunately, the remedy to such an extraordinary challenge does not appear to rely on developing more physical infrastructure. It rather appears that smart individual mobility solutions, based on (quick) technology development and thus simpler to operate could be a solution to overcome the mobility needs of society, at least in the short and medium-term. In this sense, point to point connectivity through electric-powered bicycles, duly complemented with last-mile connectivity options, appears as an attractive alternative for every day commuting.
What Commuters Say?
A limited survey was conducted in the National Capital Region of India with the aim of obtaining inputs from the MRTS’ users, who just took metro or bus to reach the workplace before the pandemic Covid-19. Salient findings are presented below:
Proposed Solution
The Concept
Development of Dedicated Bicycle Corridors
Typical Features of the Corridor
Conclusion
Personal mobility is critical for the survival of those who could use the public transport earlier. Junior to mid-level employees in almost all offices / enterprises are either working from home or unable to reach office. In such situation, the concept of dedicated bicycle corridors appears a workable simple solution, which can be adapted quickly to provide mobility to those who need it most to ensure normalcy in day to day life in urban areas. Proposed solution could also be applied to other metro cities and other countries in the world. This corridor appears to be taking care of the most crucial part for economic development- i.e., Personal daily commute to the workplace. It is economic, eco-friendly and an aid to the good health of the user. In fact it is a befitting example of sustainable development and achievement of the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals.
Authors:
Naresh Bana, F.I.E., M.I.M.A. is an international PPP consultant based in New Delhi. He can be reached at. Email naresh@wappp.net LinkedIn www.linkedin.com/in/narebbv4237
Domingo Peñalver, PhD is Spain based scholar specialising in PPPs. Email domingo.penalver@wappp.net , LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/domingo-p-4a165014/
Shubham Joshi and Lovesh Gupta are MBA students in University Business School, Panjab University, Chandigarh and currently on Internship. Email : Shubham Joshi shubhamjoshi.ubs@gmail.com LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/mwlite/in/shubham-joshi-158234176; Lovesh Gupta loveshgupta.ubs@gmail.com LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/mwlite/in/lovesh-gupta309